Introduction to Retirement Planning
When it comes to planning for retirement, understanding how to manage your finances effectively is crucial. This includes making informed decisions about withdrawals from Registered Retirement Funds (RRF) or similar retirement accounts. The scenario of living to 99 and 100 years old presents an interesting case study. In this situation, the tax and the estate on the final estate drops to the range of 3% to 4%, with the Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA) being larger and the Registered Retirement Fund (RFR) being smaller.
Impact of Early Withdrawals
Pulling an additional $45,000 and $70,000 at the beginning of the RFR led to a lower final tax but also resulted in a smaller estate. This approach might seem beneficial in the short term, but its long-term effects are mixed. For instance, drawing enough to exhaust the RFR by the age of 90 showed minimal advantages, with no difference in the 3% return scenario but a $31,000 advantage in the 7% return scenario. However, this advantage disappears and even turns into a disadvantage if life expectancy extends beyond initial predictions.
Considerations for Life Expectancy
At the ages of 99 and 100, the 7% return scenario surprisingly results in a disadvantage of $65,000 compared to more conservative withdrawal strategies. This suggests that if there’s a possibility of living into the hundreds, it might be prudent to stick with minimal RFR withdrawals. The impact of life expectancy on estate value is significant. If both spouses live to 90 and 91 with a 5% return, their final estate could be around $2,172,000. In contrast, if one spouse passes away at 75, and the survivor continues to spend $120,000 annually, the final estate would be significantly lower, at $695,000. This drastic reduction is not primarily due to taxes but rather the loss of Canada Pension Plan (CPP) and Old Age Security (OAS) benefits.
Understanding the Role of CPP and OAS
The lifelong CPP and OAS benefits amount to $511,800, which is a substantial loss if one spouse passes away early. To compensate for this loss, more must be withdrawn from investments, leaving less for growth and tax-free accumulation. This highlights the importance of considering all sources of retirement income when planning for the future.
When to Exhaust a RFR
It becomes a clear advantage to draw money from an RFR if there’s a likelihood that one spouse might pass away at a younger age, such as 75. However, the question remains whether to plan for a shortened or extended life expectancy. A prudent approach might be to plan for a longer life expectancy and make only the minimum required RFR withdrawals if that’s all that’s needed for a comfortable retirement. If health issues are anticipated or if one is in their late 80s or 90s, it might make sense to withdraw larger amounts from the RFR.
Conclusion
Retirement planning is complex and highly individualized, depending on numerous factors including life expectancy, investment returns, and government benefits. Understanding these dynamics is key to making informed decisions about RFR withdrawals and ensuring a secure and comfortable retirement. By considering the potential impacts of life expectancy, investment strategies, and government benefits, individuals can better navigate the complexities of retirement planning and make choices that support their long-term financial well-being.
About the Author
Allan Norman, MSC, CFP, CIM, is an Associate Portfolio Manager at Aligned Capital Partners Inc. With over 30 years of experience as a financial planner, he specializes in helping Canadians maintain their lifestyle without the fear of outliving their money.